CIFAS vs SIRA marker: what is the difference? ↗
Compares the two databases, including who controls each and where a challenge is directed, and notes a person can have both types of marker at once, each needing its own challenge.
Offers help challenging CIFAS markers and dealing with debanking and frozen accounts, including approaching banks and agencies about releasing funds.
SRA registration checked 30 September 2026
A listing is not a recommendation. Check that the firm is right for your case before instructing it.
Compares the two databases, including who controls each and where a challenge is directed, and notes a person can have both types of marker at once, each needing its own challenge.
Explains that a SIRA marker is an entry on a separate fraud prevention database run by Synectics Solutions, is not a criminal conviction, and may be challenged if inaccurate or unfair, starting with a subject access request.
Summarises the 2025 filing figures from Fraudscape, how long markers can last, and a three-step route to challenge one: a subject access request, evidence from the filing firm, then a targeted appeal or Ombudsman complaint.
Outlines the headline figures in the Cifas Fraudscape 2026 report on National Fraud Database filings, and the firm's view of how wrongly applied markers can be challenged with evidence.
Discusses reports that UK banks block or delay a large share of payments to crypto exchanges, industry concerns about blanket restrictions, and options for challenging closures or blocked payments.
Covers press reporting that around 453,000 accounts were closed in 2025, the expected April 2026 change to 90 days' notice and clearer reasons, and the routes for challenging a closure, including complaints and subject access requests.